Soloflex
American home-fitness equipment brand known for resistance machines using elastic Weightstraps instead of conventional pulley systems.
Last updated August 24, 2026
Overview
Soloflex refers both to an American fitness-equipment brand and to the home-gym machines developed and manufactured by Soloflex, Inc. The company originated as Bucksteel Mfg in Roswell, New Mexico, where it operated from a small facility on the former Army Air Force base south of the city. It was established in 1978 by Jerry Wilson, whose concept for the product grew from his experience flying small aircraft. Aircraft control systems use bungee-like resistance, and Wilson adapted that principle into an exercise system based on heavy-duty elastic elements rather than the pulleys, weight stacks, or free-weight plates commonly associated with home gyms. The resulting Weightstrap system was designed to provide variable resistance during exercise. Soloflex promoted the straps as capable of producing resistance comparable to substantial amounts of free weight while allowing the equipment to remain relatively compact and versatile for household use. After the company moved from New Mexico to Hillsboro, Oregon, in 1980, Bucksteel changed its name to Soloflex. The Oregon base became the company’s principal location and the center of its brand identity. Soloflex built awareness through direct-response marketing, including an infomercial featuring model Scott Madsen. This television-led approach helped the company reach consumers interested in strength training at home without requiring a conventional gym membership. By 1984, reported annual sales had reached $18 million. Over time, the basic machine was supplemented with accessories and attachments, including butterfly and leg-extension components, broadening the number of exercises that could be performed on the platform. The company also supplied instructional material, including an exercise DVD, as part of its home-gym proposition. A later product expansion was the Soloflex Whole Body Vibration, or WBV, Platform. It was marketed around the idea that vibration during weight training could intensify conditioning and potentially support faster muscle development. The platform attracted scrutiny in 2007 when Consumer Reports questioned whether research cited in the product’s marketing could be applied to the Soloflex machine. The publication noted that some research concerned other products or laboratory equipment and that the Soloflex platform’s vibration levels differed from those examined in the studies. Consumer Reports acknowledged that some research suggested possible benefits for strength or balance from certain vibrating machines, but reported that experts could not establish whether the Soloflex product produced those effects. Soloflex disputed the publication’s comments concerning calorie burning but did not publicly address all of the other issues described in the review. Soloflex occupied a distinctive position in the home-fitness market by emphasizing a proprietary elastic-resistance mechanism and an integrated, multi-exercise machine rather than a conventional free-weight setup. Its products were associated with home strength training, direct-response advertising, and a mechanical approach intended to simplify resistance exercise. The brand existed in the same broad competitive category as home-gym and fitness-equipment names such as Bowflex and NordicTrack, although its Weightstrap technology gave it a separate product identity. By April 29, 2023, the Soloflex website had been taken offline. An email from the company reportedly confirmed that it was shutting down operations. No reliable information in the supplied reference material identifies a successor owner, parent company, later operating entity, or continuing official sales channel. Accordingly, Soloflex is treated here as a defunct or closed brand rather than an active fitness-equipment company.
History
Soloflex began in 1978 as Bucksteel Mfg in Roswell, New Mexico. Founder Jerry Wilson developed the central product idea from the resistance supplied by bungee-like systems in small-aircraft controls. He translated that mechanical principle into the Weightstrap, a heavy-duty elastic resistance element intended to reproduce the training effect of large amounts of free weight without relying on a conventional pulley arrangement. The company relocated to Hillsboro, Oregon, in 1980 and adopted the Soloflex name after the move. Its products were positioned as home gyms for strength and conditioning, combining a frame with elastic resistance and attachments that enabled users to perform multiple exercises. The company also distributed instructional material, including an exercise DVD. Marketing relied in part on infomercials, one of which featured model Scott Madsen. This direct-response strategy helped Soloflex establish visibility among consumers seeking compact home exercise equipment. The business grew during the early 1980s. By 1984, its annual sales were reported at $18 million, although the supplied reference does not provide a financial filing or other primary source for that figure. Product development subsequently added features such as butterfly attachments and leg extensions, extending the machine beyond its original configuration. Soloflex later entered the whole-body-vibration category with the WBV Platform. The product was promoted on the theory that vibration combined with resistance training could amplify conditioning effects and encourage faster muscle growth. In July 2007, Consumer Reports examined the platform’s evidence base and raised questions about whether studies cited in Soloflex material actually applied to the company’s machine. The review distinguished between research on certain vibrating machines and the specific Soloflex platform, whose vibration characteristics differed from those in the cited work. Soloflex disputed the review’s criticism concerning calorie-burning claims, while the available reference does not record a detailed response to the remaining points. The brand remained associated with home-gym equipment and elastic resistance, alongside broader competitors such as Bowflex and NordicTrack. Its later corporate history is not documented in the supplied material. On April 29, 2023, the company’s website was reported to have shut down, and an email confirmation stated that Soloflex was closing operations. No successor structure, parent company, acquisition, or continuing official business has been identified here.
- 2023Operations reportedly shut down
The company website went offline, and an email reportedly confirmed that Soloflex was shutting down operations.
- 2007WBV Platform receives critical review
Consumer Reports questioned whether research cited in marketing materials applied to the Soloflex Whole Body Vibration Platform.
- 1984Reported annual sales reach $18 million
Reference material reports annual sales of $18 million by this year; the supplied material does not identify a primary financial source.
- 1980Relocation to Oregon and adoption of the Soloflex name
The company moved to Hillsboro, Oregon, and changed its name from Bucksteel to Soloflex.
- 1978Company established as Bucksteel Mfg
Jerry Wilson established the company in Roswell, New Mexico, developing the elastic Weightstrap concept for home exercise equipment.
Products and positioning
A home-strength-training brand differentiated by elastic Weightstrap resistance, multifunctional exercise machines, and direct-response consumer marketing.
Soloflex exercise machineHome gym resistance machine
The core Soloflex home gym used elastic Weightstraps to create variable resistance instead of relying on a conventional pulley system. Its frame was designed for multiple strength-training exercises, and the product could be expanded with attachments such as butterfly and leg-extension components. Instructional material, including an exercise DVD, accompanied the equipment.
Soloflex WeightstrapResistance technology1978
The Weightstrap was Soloflex’s defining resistance element: a heavy-duty elastic strap intended to provide variable resistance during exercise. The concept drew on the bungee-like resistance found in small-aircraft control systems and was marketed as an alternative to large amounts of free weight.
Soloflex Whole Body Vibration (WBV) PlatformVibration fitness equipment
The WBV Platform combined vibration with exercise and weight training. Soloflex presented the product as a way to intensify conditioning and potentially support faster muscle growth. Its marketing evidence was questioned by Consumer Reports in 2007, which said that available research did not clearly establish whether the Soloflex machine produced the claimed effects.
Flagship businesses
- Soloflex exercise machine
- Soloflex Whole Body Vibration (WBV) Platform
Marketing campaigns
- Scott Madsen infomercial campaign
United States
Soloflex used an infomercial featuring model Scott Madsen to promote its home exercise machine and explain its resistance-based training proposition.
Outcome. The campaign supported brand visibility, and reported annual sales had reached $18 million by 1984.
Brand decisions
- 2023Shut down operationsStrategy
The Soloflex website became unavailable on April 29, 2023.
What changed. An email from the company reportedly confirmed that it was closing operations.
Aftermath. No continuing official website, successor company, or new owner is identified in the supplied reference material.
- 1980Move production to Oregon and rename the companyStrategy
The business began as Bucksteel Mfg in Roswell, New Mexico, and operated from a small facility on a former military air base.
What changed. The company relocated to Hillsboro, Oregon, and changed its name to Soloflex.
Aftermath. Hillsboro became the company’s stated base, and the Soloflex name was used for both the company and its principal exercise-machine brand.
- Introduce the Whole Body Vibration PlatformProduct launch
Soloflex expanded beyond its core elastic-resistance home gym into whole-body-vibration equipment.
What changed. The company launched and marketed the Soloflex WBV Platform for use with exercise and weight training.
Aftermath. The product received scrutiny in 2007 over whether research cited in its marketing applied to the Soloflex machine.
Leadership
| Name | Title | Tenure |
|---|---|---|
| Jerry Wilson | Founderformer | 1978– |
Recent events
- 2023Soloflex confirms shutdown of operations
After the Soloflex website became unavailable on April 29, 2023, an email from the company reportedly confirmed that it was shutting down operations.
Bankruptcy - 2007Consumer Reports questions evidence used in Soloflex WBV Platform marketing
A Consumer Reports review questioned whether research cited by Soloflex supported claims about its Whole Body Vibration Platform. The review said that some cited studies involved competing products or laboratory machines and that the Soloflex platform used different vibration levels. Soloflex disputed the publication’s comments about calorie burning but did not address all of the other concerns reported.
OtherProduct launch
Sources
Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/soloflex · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled