BrandWikiReturn

Orion (spacecraft)

The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) is a partially reusable crewed spacecraft used by NASA for the Artemis lunar exploration program. It consists of a crew module (CM), a space capsule built by Lockheed Martin, and is paired with a European Service Module (ESM) provided by the European Space Agency (ESA) and manufactured by Airbus Defence and Space. Orion supports a crew of four beyond low Earth orbit for up to 21 days undocked or up to six months when docked. It is equipped with a NASA Docking System port and glass cockpit displays. It is intended to be launched atop the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket with a tower-mounted launch escape system.

Orion was conceived in the early 2000s by Lockheed Martin as a proposal for the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) to be used in NASA's Constellation program and was selected by NASA in 2006. After the cancellation of the Constellation program in 2010, Orion was extensively redesigned for use in NASA's Journey to Mars initiative; later named Moon to Mars. The SLS became Orion's primary launch vehicle, and the service module was replaced with a design based on ESA's Automated Transfer Vehicle.

As of 2026, three flight-worthy vehicles had been built along with several boilerplates and test articles. Three additional flight-worthy vehicles are under construction.

In May 2025, the second Trump administration proposed terminating the Orion spacecraft program after Artemis III. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed in July 2025 included a provision to fund procurement of Orion for Artemis IV and reuse in future missions.[4]

Design

Orion is based on the configuration of the Apollo command and service module (CSM), with a larger diameter, updated thermal protection system, and modern avionics. It is designed for deep space missions supporting up to 21 days of active crew operations and up to six months of quiescent spacecraft operation.[5] The Orion crew module launches with the European Service Module, a spacecraft adapter, and a launch abort system.

The Orion crew module (CM) is a reusable capsule providing habitable volume, storage for consumables and research equipment, and an International Docking System Standard (IDSS) port for crew transfers.[6] It is the only major spacecraft element that returns to Earth after each mission and is designed for refurbishment and reuse, with modular systems intended to support incremental upgrades over time.

Structure and manufacture

The CM is built of aluminum-lithium alloy and has a 57.5° frustum shape with a blunt spherical aft end, 5.02 m in diameter and 3.3 m in length,[7] with a mass of about 8.5 MT. The module provides approximately 50% more internal volume than the Apollo command module and is designed to carry four astronauts on Artemis missions.[1] It is manufactured by Lockheed Martin, with the pressure vessel built at the Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, Louisiana, and final assembly conducted at the Operations and Checkout Building at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.[8][9][10][11]

Thermal protection

After evaluation of thermal protection materials, NASA selected AVCOAT for the ablative heat shield. AVCOAT consists of silica fibers embedded in a resin within a honeycomb structure of fiberglass and phenolic resin. It was previously used on the Apollo missions and the Space Shuttle orbiter.[12]

Crew systems and accommodations

The CM uses a glass cockpit with digital control systems derived in part from those used in the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.[13] The commander and pilot are seated facing three main display screens and seven switch panels within arm’s reach, which provide spacecraft status information and allow control of onboard systems. A cursor control device enables interaction with the display screens under high g-forces, when the crew can not easily reach out. The interface supports both routine operations and anomaly response through integrated electronic procedures and warning systems. Rotational and translational hand controllers enable the crew to manually adjust the spacecraft’s orientation and movement.[14]

The four crew seats are designed to accommodate a wide range of astronaut body sizes, from approximately the 1st to the 99th percentile, and are adjustable. For launch and re-entry, astronauts are positioned on their backs with knees bent at a 90-degree angle and feet secured in foot pans. Each seat incorporates a five-point harness, headrests, and shoulder and hip bolsters, with foot restraints that interface with crew footwear to limit movement. The seats include an impact attenuation system, which reduces loads during splashdown by allowing controlled motion along guide rails. Once in orbit, the foot pans on the commander and pilot seats are removed and stowed to increase cabin space, and a cargo net over the mission specialist seats provides stowage for equipment and suit components.[14][15]

The spacecraft operates with a mixed nitrogen/oxygen (/) atmosphere at either sea-level pressure (101.3 kPa) or a reduced pressure (55.2 to 70.3 kPa). As of 2019, the Spacecraft Atmosphere Monitor was planned to be used in the Orion CM.[16]

The CM includes the compact Orion flywheel exercise device, which allows astronauts to perform aerobic and resistance exercises during flight using a cable-driven flywheel mechanism. The system was designed to meet the spacecraft's mass and volume constraints while also allowing for a wide-range of exercises. Mounted below the side hatch, it also functions as a step for crew members entering or exiting the spacecraft.[14][17][18]

The Orion CM includes a space toilet called the Universal Waste Management System (UWMS) inside a fully enclosed 5 ft2 compartment for privacy that uses airflow to manage liquid and solid waste. Solid waste is stored in sealed containers, while treated liquid waste is vented overboard.[14]

The potable water dispenser supplies water for rehydrating food, preparing drinks, and supporting medical needs in Orion. It connects to four pressurized tanks in the service module. A briefcase-style food warmer plugs into Orion's power utility panel for operation and allows the crew to heat food and beverages. It can be secured to cabin surfaces using Velcro when needed and stowed when not in use.[14]

Launch and recovery

During launch, the spacecraft is equipped with a launch abort system (LAS), attached to the nose of the spacecraft. The spacecraft is covered by a fiberglass "Boost Protective Cover" that shields the crew module from aerodynamic and impact stresses during the first 2 1/2 minutes of ascent.[19]

The capsule is recovered by parachute-assisted water landing. The parachute system is derived from those used on Apollo spacecraft and Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters and is constructed of Nomex.[20]

European Service Module (ESM)

Launch Abort System (LAS)

In the event of an emergency on the launch pad or during ascent, the Launch Abort System (LAS) will separate the crew module from the launch vehicle using three solid rocket motors: an abort motor (AM),[21] an attitude control motor (ACM), and a jettison motor (JM). The AM provides the thrust needed to accelerate the capsule, while the ACM is used to point the AM[22] and the jettison motor separates the LAS from the crew capsule.[23] On July 10, 2007, Orbital Sciences, the prime contractor for the LAS, awarded Alliant Techsystems (ATK) a $62.5 million sub-contract to "design, develop, produce, test and deliver the launch abort motor," which uses a "reverse flow" design.[24] On July 9, 2008, NASA announced that ATK had completed construction of a vertical test stand at a facility in Promontory, Utah to test launch abort motors for the Orion spacecraft.[25] Another long-time space motor contractor, Aerojet, was awarded the jettison motor design and development contract for the LAS. As of September 2008, Aerojet has, along with team members Orbital Sciences, Lockheed Martin and NASA, successfully demonstrated two full-scale test firings of the jettison motor. This motor is used on every flight, as it separates the LAS from the vehicle after both a successful launch and a launch abort.[26]

Performance

With the announcement in 2019 of the intent to procure a Human Landing System for Artemis missions, NASA provided Orion mass and propulsion capability values. After separation from the SLS upper stage, the Orion is expected to have a mass of 26,375 kg and be capable of performing maneuvers requiring up to 1,050 m/s of delta-v.[27]

History

The Orion MPCV was announced by NASA on May 24, 2011. Its design is based on the Crew Exploration Vehicle from the canceled Constellation program,[28] which had been a 2006 NASA contract award to Lockheed Martin.[29] The command module is being built by Lockheed Martin at the Michoud Assembly Facility,[9][10] while the Orion service module is being built by Airbus Defence and Space in Bremen with funding from the European Space Agency.[30][31][32][33] The CM's first uncrewed test flight (EFT-1) was launched without the EUS atop a Delta IV Heavy rocket on December 5, 2014, and lasted 4 hours and 24 minutes before landing at its target in the Pacific Ocean.[34]

Orion was primarily designed by Lockheed Martin Space Systems in Littleton, Colorado, with former Space Shuttle engineer Julie Kramer White at NASA as Orion's chief engineer.[35]

On November 30, 2020, it was reported that NASA and Lockheed Martin had found a failure with a component in one of the Orion spacecraft's power data units but NASA later clarified that it did not expect the issue to affect the Artemis I launch date.[36]

Funding history and planning

NASA has spent $24.1 billion on Orion development from 2006 through 2024, in nominal dollars. This is equivalent to $31.4 billion in 2025 dollars using the NASA New Start Inflation Indices.[37]

In 2025, the Enacted NASA Budget for Exploration, which includes Orion, is approximately the same again as 2024.[54]

Excluded from the prior Orion costs are:

In late 2015, the Orion program was assessed at a 70% confidence level for its first crewed flight by 2023,[60] but in January 2024 NASA announced plans for a first crewed flight of Orion no earlier than September 2025. This has subsequently been updated to a first crewed flight with Orion, on mission Artemis II, which launched on April 1, 2026.[61][62]

In 2016, the NASA manager of exploration systems development said that Orion, SLS, and supporting ground systems should cost "US$2 billion or less" annually. NASA will not provide the cost per flight of Orion and SLS, with associate administrator William H. Gerstenmaier stating "costs must be derived from the data and are not directly available. This was done by design to lower NASA's expenditures" in 2017. As of 2020, there were no NASA estimates for the Orion program recurring yearly costs once operational, for a certain flight rate per year, or for the resulting average costs per flight. A production and operations contract[63] awarded to Lockheed Martin in 2019 indicated NASA will pay the prime contractor $900 million for the first three Orion capsules and $633 million for the next three. For 2021 to 2025, NASA estimates[64] yearly budgets for Orion from $1.4 to $1.1 billion.

  • Most costs "for production, operations, or sustainment of additional crew capsules, despite plans to use and possibly enhance this capsule after 2021";[55] production and operations contracts were awarded going into fiscal year 2020.[56]
  • Costs of the first service module and spare parts, which are provided by ESA[57] for the test flight of Orion (about US$1 billion)
  • Costs to assemble, integrate, prepare and launch the Orion and its launcher, funded separately in the NASA Ground Operations Project,[58] currently about $600 million[59] per year
  • Costs of the launcher, the SLS, for the Orion spacecraft

Attempted cancellation of Orion program

On 2 May 2025, the Trump administration released its fiscal year 2026 budget proposal for NASA, which calls for terminating the Orion and SLS programs after Artemis III.[65] The budget allocates funding for a program to transition to "more cost-effective commercial systems".[66] However, this proposal was rejected by Congress on July 2025, favoring the continuation of the program alongside the SLS and the Lunar Gateway.

Variants

Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV)

The idea for a Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) was announced on January 14, 2004, as part of the Vision for Space Exploration after the Space Shuttle Columbia accident.[67] The CEV effectively replaced the conceptual Orbital Space Plane (OSP), a proposed replacement for the Space Shuttle. A design competition was held, and the winner was the proposal from a consortium led by Lockheed Martin. It was subsequently named "Orion" in 2006[68] after the stellar constellation and mythical hunter of the same name,[69] and became part of the Constellation program under NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe. , NASA planned for the first flight to the International Space Station with astronauts onboard to be no later than 2014.[68]

Constellation proposed using the Orion CEV in both crew and cargo variants to support the International Space Station and as a crew vehicle for a return to the Moon. The crew/command module was originally intended to land on solid ground on the US west coast using airbags but later changed to ocean splashdown, while a service module was included for life support and propulsion. With a diameter of 5 m as opposed to 3.9 m, the Orion CEV would have provided 2.5 times greater volume than the Apollo CM.[70] The service module was originally planned to use liquid methane (CH4) as its fuel, but switched to hypergolic propellants due to the infancy of oxygen/methane-powered rocket technologies and the goal of launching the first uncrewed Orion CEV by 2012.[71][72][73]

The Orion CEV was to be launched on the Ares I rocket to low Earth orbit, where it would rendezvous with the Altair lunar lander launched on a heavy-lift Ares V launch vehicle for lunar missions.

Environmental testing

NASA performed environmental testing of Orion from 2007 to 2011 at the Glenn Research Center Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. The Center's Space Power Facility is the world's largest thermal vacuum chamber.[74]

Launch Abort System (LAS) testing

ATK Aerospace successfully completed the first Orion Launch Abort System (LAS) test on November 20, 2008. The LAS motor could provide 500000 lbf of thrust in case an emergency situation should arise on the launch pad or during the first 300000 ft of the rocket's climb to orbit.[75]

On March 2, 2009, a full size, full weight command module mockup (pathfinder) began its journey from the Langley Research Center to White Sands Missile Range in southern New Mexico for at-gantry launch vehicle assembly training and for LES testing.[76] On May 10, 2010, NASA successfully executed the LES PAD-Abort-1 test at White Sands, launching a boilerplate (mock-up) Orion capsule to an altitude of approximately 6000 ft. The test used three solid-fuel rocket motors – the main thrust motor, an attitude control motor and the jettison motor.[77]

Splashdown recovery testing

In 2009, during the Constellation phase of the program, the Post-landing Orion Recovery Test (PORT) was designed to determine and evaluate methods of crew rescue and what kind of motions the astronaut crew could expect after landing, including conditions outside the capsule for the recovery team. The evaluation process supported NASA's design of landing recovery operations including equipment, ship and crew needs.

The PORT Test used a full-scale boilerplate (mock-up) of NASA's Orion crew module and was tested in water under simulated and real weather conditions. Tests began March 23, 2009, with a Navy-built, 18000 lb boilerplate in a test pool. Full sea testing ran April 6–30, 2009, at various locations off the coast of NASA's Kennedy Space Center with media coverage.[78]

Cancellation of Constellation program

On May 7, 2009, the Obama administration enlisted the Augustine Commission to perform a full independent review of the ongoing NASA space exploration program. The commission found the then-current Constellation Program to be too under-budgeted with significant cost overruns, behind schedule by four years or more in several essential components, and unlikely to be capable of meeting any of its scheduled goals.[79][80] As a consequence, the commission recommended a significant re-allocation of goals and resources. As one of the many outcomes based on these recommendations, on October 11, 2010, the Constellation program was canceled, ending development of the Altair, Ares I, and Ares V. The Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle survived the cancellation and was transferred to be launched on the Space Launch System.[81]

Environmental testing

NASA performed environmental testing of Orion from 2007 to 2011 at the Glenn Research Center Plum Brook Station in Sandusky, Ohio. The Center's Space Power Facility is the world's largest thermal vacuum chamber.[74]

Launch Abort System (LAS) testing

ATK Aerospace successfully completed the first Orion Launch Abort System (LAS) test on November 20, 2008. The LAS motor could provide 500000 lbf of thrust in case an emergency situation should arise on the launch pad or during the first 300000 ft of the rocket's climb to orbit.[75]

On March 2, 2009, a full size, full weight command module mockup (pathfinder) began its journey from the Langley Research Center to White Sands Missile Range in southern New Mexico for at-gantry launch vehicle assembly training and for LES testing.[76] On May 10, 2010, NASA successfully executed the LES PAD-Abort-1 test at White Sands, launching a boilerplate (mock-up) Orion capsule to an altitude of approximately 6000 ft. The test used three solid-fuel rocket motors – the main thrust motor, an attitude control motor and the jettison motor.[77]

Splashdown recovery testing

In 2009, during the Constellation phase of the program, the Post-landing Orion Recovery Test (PORT) was designed to determine and evaluate methods of crew rescue and what kind of motions the astronaut crew could expect after landing, including conditions outside the capsule for the recovery team. The evaluation process supported NASA's design of landing recovery operations including equipment, ship and crew needs.

The PORT Test used a full-scale boilerplate (mock-up) of NASA's Orion crew module and was tested in water under simulated and real weather conditions. Tests began March 23, 2009, with a Navy-built, 18000 lb boilerplate in a test pool. Full sea testing ran April 6–30, 2009, at various locations off the coast of NASA's Kennedy Space Center with media coverage.[78]

Cancellation of Constellation program

On May 7, 2009, the Obama administration enlisted the Augustine Commission to perform a full independent review of the ongoing NASA space exploration program. The commission found the then-current Constellation Program to be too under-budgeted with significant cost overruns, behind schedule by four years or more in several essential components, and unlikely to be capable of meeting any of its scheduled goals.[79][80] As a consequence, the commission recommended a significant re-allocation of goals and resources. As one of the many outcomes based on these recommendations, on October 11, 2010, the Constellation program was canceled, ending development of the Altair, Ares I, and Ares V. The Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle survived the cancellation and was transferred to be launched on the Space Launch System.[81]

Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV)

The Orion development program was restructured from three different versions of the Orion capsule, each for a different task,[82] to the development of the MPCV as a single version capable of performing multiple tasks.[3] On December 5, 2014, a developmental Orion spacecraft was successfully launched into space and retrieved at sea after splashdown on the Exploration Flight Test-1 (EFT-1).[83][84]

Orion splashdown recovery testing

Before EFT-1 in December 2014, several preparatory vehicle recovery tests were performed, which continued the "crawl, walk, run" approach established by PORT. The Stationary Recovery Test (SRT) demonstrated the recovery hardware and techniques that were to be employed for the recovery of the Orion CM in the protected waters of Naval Station Norfolk using the LPD-17 type USS Arlington as the recovery ship.[85]

Orion splashdown recovery testing

Before EFT-1 in December 2014, several preparatory vehicle recovery tests were performed, which continued the "crawl, walk, run" approach established by PORT. The Stationary Recovery Test (SRT) demonstrated the recovery hardware and techniques that were to be employed for the recovery of the Orion CM in the protected waters of Naval Station Norfolk using the LPD-17 type USS Arlington as the recovery ship.[85]

Orion Lite

History

Orion Lite is an unofficial name used in the media for a lightweight crew capsule proposed by Bigelow Aerospace in collaboration with Lockheed Martin. It was to be based on the Orion spacecraft that Lockheed Martin was developing for NASA. It was never developed. It was to be a lighter, less capable and a less expensive version of the full Orion.

Orion Lite was intended to provide a stripped-down version of the Orion that would be available for missions to the International Space Station earlier than the more capable Orion, which is designed for longer duration missions to the Moon and Mars.[86]

Bigelow had begun working with Lockheed Martin in 2004. A few years later Bigelow signed a million-dollar contract to develop "an Orion mockup, an Orion Lite",[87] in 2009.

The proposed collaboration between Bigelow and Lockheed Martin on the Orion Lite spacecraft has ended. Bigelow began work with Boeing on a similar capsule, the CST-100, which has no Orion heritage, and was one of the two systems selected under NASA's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program to transport crew to the ISS.[88]

Design

Orion Lite's primary mission would be to transport crew to the International Space Station (ISS), or to private space stations such as the planned B330 from Bigelow Aerospace. While Orion Lite would have the same exterior dimensions as the Orion, there would be no need for the deep space infrastructure present in the Orion configuration. As such, the Orion Lite would have been able to support larger crews of around 7 people as the result of greater habitable interior volume and the reduced weight of equipment needed to support an exclusively low-Earth-orbit configuration.[89]

Recovery

In order to reduce the weight of Orion Lite, the more durable heat shield of the Orion would be replaced with a lighter weight heat shield designed to support the lower temperatures of Earth atmospheric re-entry from low Earth orbit. Additionally, the current proposal calls for a mid-air retrieval, wherein another aircraft captures the descending Orion Lite module. To date, such a retrieval method has not been employed for crewed spacecraft, although it has been used with satellites.[90]

History

Orion Lite is an unofficial name used in the media for a lightweight crew capsule proposed by Bigelow Aerospace in collaboration with Lockheed Martin. It was to be based on the Orion spacecraft that Lockheed Martin was developing for NASA. It was never developed. It was to be a lighter, less capable and a less expensive version of the full Orion.

Orion Lite was intended to provide a stripped-down version of the Orion that would be available for missions to the International Space Station earlier than the more capable Orion, which is designed for longer duration missions to the Moon and Mars.[86]

Bigelow had begun working with Lockheed Martin in 2004. A few years later Bigelow signed a million-dollar contract to develop "an Orion mockup, an Orion Lite",[87] in 2009.

The proposed collaboration between Bigelow and Lockheed Martin on the Orion Lite spacecraft has ended. Bigelow began work with Boeing on a similar capsule, the CST-100, which has no Orion heritage, and was one of the two systems selected under NASA's Commercial Crew Development (CCDev) program to transport crew to the ISS.[88]

Design

Orion Lite's primary mission would be to transport crew to the International Space Station (ISS), or to private space stations such as the planned B330 from Bigelow Aerospace. While Orion Lite would have the same exterior dimensions as the Orion, there would be no need for the deep space infrastructure present in the Orion configuration. As such, the Orion Lite would have been able to support larger crews of around 7 people as the result of greater habitable interior volume and the reduced weight of equipment needed to support an exclusively low-Earth-orbit configuration.[89]

Recovery

In order to reduce the weight of Orion Lite, the more durable heat shield of the Orion would be replaced with a lighter weight heat shield designed to support the lower temperatures of Earth atmospheric re-entry from low Earth orbit. Additionally, the current proposal calls for a mid-air retrieval, wherein another aircraft captures the descending Orion Lite module. To date, such a retrieval method has not been employed for crewed spacecraft, although it has been used with satellites.[90]

Flights

Development test flights

Crewed missions

Upcoming missions

Commercial lunar missions

In December 2025, Lockheed Martin announced plans to offer commercial flights to individuals and other space agencies aboard Orion in the future, aiming to reuse the capsules after Artemis III to drive down the cost of spacecraft operations.

Potential Mars missions

The Orion capsule is designed to support future missions to send astronauts to Mars, with many proposals for such a mission to take place in the 2030s, including in an official plan by NASA in 2015.[94] Since the Orion capsule provides only about 2.25 m3 of living space per crew member,[95] the use of an additional Deep Space Habitat (DSH) module featuring propulsion will be needed for long-duration missions. The complete spacecraft stack is known as the Deep Space Transport.[96] The habitat module will provide additional space and supplies, as well as facilitate spacecraft maintenance, mission communications, exercise, training, and personal recreation.[97] Some concepts for DSH modules would provide approximately 70.0 m3 of living space per crew member,[97] though the DSH module is in its early conceptual stage. DSH sizes and configurations may vary slightly, depending on crew and mission needs.[98] As of 2026, there are no plans for a crewed mission to Mars using Orion, and the mission timeline to launch in the early 2030s is deemed unfeasible.

Commercial lunar missions

In December 2025, Lockheed Martin announced plans to offer commercial flights to individuals and other space agencies aboard Orion in the future, aiming to reuse the capsules after Artemis III to drive down the cost of spacecraft operations.

Potential Mars missions

The Orion capsule is designed to support future missions to send astronauts to Mars, with many proposals for such a mission to take place in the 2030s, including in an official plan by NASA in 2015.[94] Since the Orion capsule provides only about 2.25 m3 of living space per crew member,[95] the use of an additional Deep Space Habitat (DSH) module featuring propulsion will be needed for long-duration missions. The complete spacecraft stack is known as the Deep Space Transport.[96] The habitat module will provide additional space and supplies, as well as facilitate spacecraft maintenance, mission communications, exercise, training, and personal recreation.[97] Some concepts for DSH modules would provide approximately 70.0 m3 of living space per crew member,[97] though the DSH module is in its early conceptual stage. DSH sizes and configurations may vary slightly, depending on crew and mission needs.[98] As of 2026, there are no plans for a crewed mission to Mars using Orion, and the mission timeline to launch in the early 2030s is deemed unfeasible.

Canceled

Asteroid Redirect Mission

The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), also known as the Asteroid Retrieval and Utilization (ARU) mission and the Asteroid Initiative, was a space mission proposed by NASA in 2013. The Asteroid Retrieval Robotic Mission (ARRM) spacecraft would rendezvous with a large near-Earth asteroid and use robotic arms with anchoring grippers to retrieve a 4-meter boulder from the asteroid. A secondary objective was to develop the required technology to bring a small near-Earth asteroid into lunar orbit – "the asteroid was a bonus." There, it could be analyzed by the crew of the Orion EM-5 or EM-6 ARCM mission in 2026.

Asteroid Redirect Mission

The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), also known as the Asteroid Retrieval and Utilization (ARU) mission and the Asteroid Initiative, was a space mission proposed by NASA in 2013. The Asteroid Retrieval Robotic Mission (ARRM) spacecraft would rendezvous with a large near-Earth asteroid and use robotic arms with anchoring grippers to retrieve a 4-meter boulder from the asteroid. A secondary objective was to develop the required technology to bring a small near-Earth asteroid into lunar orbit – "the asteroid was a bonus." There, it could be analyzed by the crew of the Orion EM-5 or EM-6 ARCM mission in 2026.

List of vehicles

See also

External links

By May 2020, the ESA had signed an agreement with NASA to provide three service modules for Artemis as part of its barter arrangement with NASA to be a member of the Artemis program. The ESMs cost approximately €250 million each to acquire from Airbus, not counting the costs incurred by the ESA directly. The third ESM is slated to fly in 2024.

References

  1. Orion Reference Guide NASA Johnson Space Center, retrieved September 29, 2023^
  2. NASA Authorization Act of 2010 Thomas.Loc.gov, retrieved November 20, 2010^
  3. Orion Quick facts NASA, August 4, 2014, retrieved October 29, 2015^
  4. One Big Beautiful Bill Act Public Law 119–21, 119th United States Congress, July 4, 2025, retrieved January 18, 2026^
  5. L. Peterson. Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) NTRS.nasa.gov, NASA, 2009, retrieved April 7, 2014^
  6. NASA – A 21st Century-Style Return to the Moon nasa.gov, retrieved June 3, 2018^
  7. NASA – Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle NASA, February 7, 2009, retrieved February 7, 2009^
  8. Lockheed to build Nasa 'Moonship' BBC News, August 31, 2006, retrieved March 1, 2007^
  9. Shannon LaNasa. Michoud Tenants: Lockheed Martin Marshall Space Flight Center, NASA, 2021, retrieved June 27, 2021^
  10. Victoria Cristina. Behind the scenes at NASA Michoud: Assembly of the Orion Crew Modules WGNO, Nexstar Media Group, April 26, 2021, retrieved February 12, 2022^
  11. NASA Orion public relations. Technicians at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility completed the welding on Orion's pressure vessel which will carry @NASA_Astronauts to the Moon on #Artemis III. September 10, 2021^
  12. NASA Selects Material for Orion Spacecraft Heat Shield NASA Ames Research Center, April 7, 2009, retrieved April 16, 2009^
  13. Rob Coppinger. NASA Orion crew vehicle will use voice controls in Boeing 787-style Honeywell smart cockpit Flight International, October 6, 2006^
  14. Life Inside Orion Fact Sheet NASA, February 2026, retrieved April 13, 2026^
  15. Crew Systems NASA, March 5, 2025, retrieved 2026-04-15^
  16. Denise Hill. S.A.M. Goes to Work Aboard ISS NASA, July 23, 2019, retrieved July 31, 2019^
  17. Artemis II Flight Day 2: Orion Completes TLI Burn, Crew Begins Journey to the Moon NASA, 2026-04-02^
  18. Mike Hanson. Artemis II crew space moon mission WESH, 2026-04-03, retrieved 2026-04-09^
  19. NASA Announces Key Decision For Next Deep Space Transportation System NASA, May 24, 2011, retrieved May 25, 2011^
  20. NASA Denies Making Orion Water Landing Decision – and Deleting Touchdowns on Land NASA Watch, August 6, 2007, retrieved November 23, 2010^
  21. Mission to the Moon: How We'll Go Back – and Stay This Time popularmechanics.com, retrieved February 8, 2008^
  22. Mika McKinnon. Meet Orion, NASA's New Deep Space Explorer Earth & Space, Space.io9.com, December 4, 2014, retrieved October 31, 2016^
  23. Launch Abort System Jettison Motor | Aerojet Rocketdyne Rocket.com, retrieved October 31, 2016^
  24. ATK Awarded Contract for Orion Launch Abort Motors PRNewswire^
  25. Orion's New Launch Abort Motor Test Stand Ready for Action NASA, retrieved January 5, 2012^
  26. Jason Rhian. Jettison Motor Readied For Integration Into Orion's LAS spaceflightinsider.com, Spaceflight Insider, July 17, 2018, retrieved July 1, 2019^
  27. NextSTEP-2 Appendix H, Attachment F: Human Landing System to Orion Interface Requirements Document (HLS-IRD-005) NASA, September 30, 2019^
  28. Marina M. Moen. Feasibility of Orion Crew Module Entry on Half of Available Propellant Due to Tank Isolation Fault American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, August 8, 2011^
  29. NASA Selects Lockheed Martin To Be Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle Prime Contractor NASA, August 31, 2006, retrieved August 31, 2006^
  30. NASA Signs Agreement for a European-Provided Orion Service Module nasa.gov, January 16, 2013, retrieved March 28, 2014^
  31. ESA workhorse to power NASA's Orion spacecraft / Research / Human Spaceflight / Our Activities / ESA Esa.int, January 16, 2013, retrieved July 15, 2014^
  32. Multi Purpose Crew Vehicle – European Service Module for NASA's Orion programme Airbus Defence and Space, retrieved March 7, 2016^
  33. Call for media: The European Service module meets Orion European Space Agency, October 26, 2018, retrieved February 6, 2020^
  34. Orion Exploration Flight Test-1 aerospaceguide.net, January 11, 2014, retrieved March 28, 2014^
  35. Alan Cesar. An Aerospace Titan Rooted in the Midwest Aerogram, December 15, 2023, retrieved January 9, 2024^
  36. Loren Grush. Component failure in NASA's deep-space crew capsule could take months to fix The Verge, 30 November 2020, retrieved 3 December 2020^
  37. ''"NASA FY22 Inflation Tables - to be utilized in FY23" (Excel). NASA. Retrieved 31 October 2022''. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.^
  38. FY 2008 Budget Estimates National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  39. Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Estimates National Aeronautics and space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  40. Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Estimates National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  41. FY 2013 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  42. FY 2014 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  43. FY 2015 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  44. FY 2016 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and space Administration, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  45. FY 2017 Budget Estimates nasa.gov, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved January 1, 2019^
  46. FY 2018 Budget Estimates nasa.gov, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved January 1, 2019^
  47. Public Law 115-31, 115th Congress congress.gov, retrieved January 1, 2019^
  48. 2018 Consolidated Appropriations Act congress.gov, retrieved January 1, 2019^
  49. FY 2021 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved May 10, 2020^
  50. H.R.1158 – 116th Congress (2019–2020): Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 www.congress.gov, 20 December 2019, retrieved 9 January 2020^
  51. ''"National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2021 Spending Plan" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original 31 October 2022. Retrieved 31 October 2022'' This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.^
  52. ''"Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022" (PDF). Retrieved 31 October 2022.'' p.212. Archived from the original on 31 October 2022. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.^
  53. FY 2025 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved August 22, 2025^
  54. FY 2026 President's Budget Request Summary National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved August 22, 2025^
  55. NASA Actions Needed to Improve Transparency and Assess Long Term Affordability of Human Exploration Programs General Accounting Office, May 2014, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  56. NASA Commits to Long-term Artemis Missions with Orion Production Contract NASA.gov, retrieved July 26, 2020^
  57. Marcia Smith. NASA-ESA Agreement on Orion Service Module is For Only One Unit Plus Spares spacepolicyonline.com, January 17, 2013, retrieved June 28, 2016^
  58. NASA's Ground Systems Development and Operations Program Completes Preliminary Design Review National Aeronautics and Space Administration, March 27, 2014, retrieved June 28, 2016^
  59. ''"National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2022 Spending Plan" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved 03 January 2023. Archived from the original on 03 January 2023. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.''^
  60. Marcia Smith. Mikulski "Deeply Troubled" by NASA's Budget Request; SLS Won't Use 70 Percent JCL spacepolicyonline.com, May 1, 2014, retrieved June 7, 2016^
  61. Orion's Missions National Aeronautics and Space Administration, retrieved August 22, 2025^
  62. Marcia Dunn. Artemis II astronauts bound for moon after rocketing away on NASA’s first lunar voyage in decades Associated Press, April 1, 2026, retrieved April 2, 2026^
  63. Orion Production and Operations Contract govtribe.com, retrieved July 26, 2020^
  64. NASA FY 2021 Budget Estimates NASA.gov, retrieved July 26, 2020^
  65. Jennifer M. Dooren, Bethany Stevens. President Trump's FY26 Budget Revitalizes Human Space Exploration NASA, 2 May 2025, retrieved 2 May 2025^
  66. Fiscal Year 2026 Discretionary Budget Request United States Office of Management and Budget, 2 May 2025^
  67. President Bush Announces New Vision for Space Exploration Program White House Office of the Press Secretary, January 14, 2004, retrieved September 1, 2006^
  68. NASA Makes It Official: CEV Will Be Called 'Orion' Aero News Network, August 23, 2006^
  69. Orion Spacecraft – Nasa Orion Spacecraft aerospaceguide.net, retrieved February 2, 2013^
  70. NASA Names New Crew Exploration Vehicle Orion NASA, August 22, 2006, retrieved April 17, 2010^
  71. Daniel Handlin, Chris Bergin. NASA sets Orion 13 for Moon Return NASAspaceflight.com, October 11, 2006, retrieved March 3, 2007^
  72. Daniel Handlin, Chris Bergin. NASA makes major design changes to CEV NASAspaceflight.com, July 22, 2006, retrieved March 3, 2007^
  73. NASA Names Orion Contractor NASA, August 31, 2006, retrieved September 5, 2006^
  74. NASA Glenn To Test Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle SpaceDaily, retrieved January 5, 2012^
  75. NASA: Constellation Abort Test November 2008 Nasa.gov, December 11, 2008, retrieved November 20, 2010^
  76. NASA Orion LAS Pathfinder Nasa.gov, retrieved November 20, 2010^
  77. NASA Completes Test of Orion Crew Capsule Fox News, May 6, 2010, retrieved April 6, 2013^
  78. NASA Orion PORT Test Nasa.gov, March 25, 2009, retrieved November 20, 2010^
  79. Augustine Commission Final Report. Published 22 Oct. 2009. Retrieved 14 December 2014.^
  80. NASA in Obama's Hands. . Information Addict Website, by Nathaniel Downes. Published 18 June 2012. Retrieved 14 Dec 2014.^
  81. Today – President Signs NASA 2010 Authorization Act Universetoday.com, retrieved November 20, 2010^
  82. What is NASA's Constellation Program? archived from the original the original Sciences 360 Website, By Tenebris. Discussion of multiple version development of Orion capsule. Published Nov. 17, 2009. Retrieved July 5, 2014.^
  83. Orion Spacecraft Complete NASA, October 30, 2014, retrieved October 30, 2014^
  84. Henry Fountain. NASA's Orion Spacecraft Splashes Down in Pacific After Test Flight The New York Times, December 5, 2014, retrieved December 5, 2014^
  85. NASA & US Navy Test Demonstrates Water Recovery of Orion Crew Capsule UniverseToday.com, August 16, 2013, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  86. Amy Klamper. Company pitches 'lite' spaceship to NASA NBC News, 14 August 2009, retrieved 7 September 2009^
  87. Bigelow still thinks big, The Space Review, 2010-11-01, accessed 2010-11-02. "[In October 2010] Bigelow revealed that he had been working with Lockheed Martin on a capsule concept in the 2004–2005 period. 'We engaged in a million-dollar contract a couple years after that with Lockheed, and they created for us an Orion mockup, an Orion Lite.'^
  88. Paul Rincon. Boeing's Starliner spacecraft: A guide BBC, 2021-08-03, retrieved 2024-10-28^
  89. Space Hotel Visionary Proposes Modified "Orion Lite" Spaceship for NASA: Bigelow Airspace's concept is for low Earth-orbit missions only, Popular Science, Jeremy Hsu, 14 August 2009^
  90. Discoverer 14 – NSSDC ID: 1960-010A NASA, retrieved February 8, 2020^
  91. NASA's New Orion Spacecraft Completes First Spaceflight Test NASA.gov, retrieved December 9, 2014^
  92. Orion Off-loaded for Trip Back to Florida NASA.gov, December 9, 2014, retrieved December 9, 2014^
  93. Claire Cameron. NASA scraps 2027 Artemis III moon landing in favor of 2028 mission Scientific American, retrieved 2026-03-11^
  94. NASA's Journey To Mars - Pioneering Next Steps in Space Exploration NASA, October 8, 2015, retrieved April 2, 2026^
  95. Preliminary Report Regarding NASA's Space Launch System and Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle NASA, January 2011, retrieved June 18, 2011^
  96. NASA Unveils the Keys to Getting Astronauts to Mars and Beyond. Neel V. Patel, The Inverse. April 4, 2017.^
  97. Habitat for Long Duration Deep Space Missions. . Preliminary design proposal for DSH by Rucker & Thompson. Published 5 May 2012, retrieved 8 December 2014.^
  98. 2012 X-Hab Academic Innovation Challenge Progress Update. . NASA DSH design news update. Published June 21, 2012, retrieved 8 Dec. 2014.^
  99. Dryden Flight Research Center. Orion Pad Abort 1 Test a Spectacular Success National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), May 6, 2010, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  100. Philip Sloss. NASA conducting data deep dive following July's Orion ascent abort test NASASpaceFlight.com, October 25, 2019, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  101. Orion Drop Test – Jan. 06, 2012 Space-travel.com, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  102. Orion Reference Guide NASA, November 10, 2022, retrieved April 13, 2025^
  103. What Goes Up Must Come Down As Orion Crew Vehicle Development Continues Space-travel.com, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  104. NASA Conducts Orion Parachute Testing for Orbital Test Flight Space-travel.com, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  105. NASA Conducts New Parachute Test for Orion Space-travel.com, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  106. Ken Kremer. 3 Welds to Go for 1st Orion Pathfinder Vehicle Universe Today, March 30, 2010, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  107. Aimee Crane. Orion's 'Twin' Completes Structural Testing for Artemis I Mission NASA, 2020-06-25, retrieved 2022-11-16^
  108. Marcia Dunn. NASA launches new Orion spacecraft and new era (w/ video) Tampa Bay Times, December 6, 2014, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  109. Jason Davis. Orion Returns to Earth after Successful Test Flight The Planetary Society, December 5, 2014, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  110. Orion EFT-1 flown spacecraft joins display in 'NASA Now' exhibit collectSPACE.com, retrieved 2020-09-21^
  111. Zen Vuong. JPL joins NASA's first agency-wide social media event to highlight Thursday's Orion flight test Pasadena Star-News, December 3, 2014, retrieved March 10, 2020^
  112. De-servicing of Artemis I Crew Module complete! Teams in the Multi-Payload Processing Facility completed cleaning cycles & removal of avionics to be reused on @NASA_Orion for Artemis II. The capsule will be used as an environmental test article on future Artemis missions. April 25, 2023^
  113. Kristyn Damadeo. Next Generation of Orion Spacecraft in Production NASA, September 9, 2021, retrieved October 6, 2021^
  114. Congress moves to reject bulk of White House's proposed NASA cuts Ars Technica, 2025-07-15, retrieved 2026-01-02^
  115. How much will SLS and Orion cost to fly? Finally, some answers Ars Technica, 2016-08-19, retrieved 2019-01-01^
  116. NASA chooses not to tell Congress how much deep space missions cost Ars Technica, 2017-10-20, retrieved 2019-01-01^
  117. After 15 years of development, Lockheed wins new cost-plus contract for Orion; Originally, NASA had hoped for a fixed-price deal Ars Technica, 2019-09-24, retrieved 2020-07-26^
  118. White House budget seeks to end SLS, Orion, and Lunar Gateway programs Ars Technica, 2025-05-02, retrieved 2025-05-03^
  119. Orion Capsule's Maker Set To Offer Moon Treks To Spacefarers Worldwide Forbes, 2025-12-28, retrieved 2026-01-01^
  120. Orion landings to be splashdowns – KSC buildings to be demolished NASASpaceflight.com, 2007-08-05, retrieved 2007-08-06^
  121. EFT-1 Orion receives hatch door – Denver Orion ready for Modal Testing NASASpaceflight.com, 2011-11-14, retrieved 2020-03-11^
  122. Orion PTV preparing for drop test on Wednesday – EFT-1 Orion progress NASASpaceflight.com, 2012-02-26, retrieved 2014-07-15^
  123. NASA ESD set key Orion requirement based on Lunar missions NASASpaceflight.com, 2012-07-10, retrieved 2012-07-23^
  124. EFT-1 Orion slips to December – Allows military satellite to launch first NASASpaceflight.com, 2014-03-15, retrieved 2014-03-29^
  125. EFT-1 Orion completes assembly and conducts FRR NASASpaceflight.com, 2014-10-30, retrieved 2014-11-10^
  126. NASA's Orion Spacecraft Splashes Down in Pacific After Test Flight The New York Times, 2014-12-05, retrieved 2014-12-06^
  127. Launch schedule shakeup delays Orion to December Spaceflight Now, 2014-03-15, retrieved 2014-03-29^
  128. ESA member states commit funding for Orion service module Spaceflight Now, 2014-12-03, retrieved 2016-06-28^
  129. Orion spacecraft may not fly with astronauts until 2023 Spaceflight Now, 2015-09-16, retrieved 2016-06-07^
  130. Critical abort test of NASA's Orion crew capsule set for Tuesday Spaceflight Now, 2019-07-01, retrieved 2020-03-11^
  131. First Crewed Orion Mission May Slip to 2023 Space News, 2015-09-16, retrieved 2015-09-17^
  132. NASA closing out Asteroid Redirect Mission Space News, 2017-06-14, retrieved 2017-09-09^
  133. Independent report concludes 2033 human Mars mission is not feasible Space News, 2019-04-18, retrieved 2021-11-09^
  134. NASA delays Artemis 2 and 3 missions Space News, 2024-01-09, retrieved 2024-06-07^
  135. NASA Goes 'Green': Next Spacecraft to be Reusable – Orion Capsule Space.com, 2013-06-13, retrieved 2014-11-30^
  136. NASA Unveils New Spaceship for Deep Space Exploration Space.com, 2011-05-24, retrieved 2011-05-26^
  137. Nevada Company Pitches 'Lite' Concept for NASA's New Spaceship Space.com, 2009-08-14, retrieved 2020-10-17^
  138. NASA's Launch Abort Test Builds on 50 Years of Astronaut Escape Systems Space.com, 2010-05-07, retrieved 2020-03-11^