Van Diemen's Land Company
A historic Tasmanian pastoral company established in 1825 for wool production and now associated primarily with dairy farming and livestock agriculture.
Last updated August 26, 2026
Overview
Van Diemen's Land Company is a historic Australian pastoral corporation based in north-western Tasmania. Chartered by the British Crown in 1825, it was created by London merchants who sought to establish a large-scale wool-growing enterprise capable of supplying Britain's expanding textile industry. The company received a substantial land grant in the north-west of Van Diemen's Land, the colonial name for Tasmania, and became one of the most powerful private landholders in the region. The company's early development was managed by Edward Curr, with James Bischoff serving as a leading director and William Sorell among the colonial figures involved in its organisation. The first company operations were based around Circular Head, while surveyor Henry Hellyer mapped the region and identified areas suitable for settlement, grazing and transport. Company holdings eventually included Woolnorth, Circular Head, Robbins Island, Middlesex Plains, Hampshire Hills, Surrey Hills and Emu Bay. The initial business model centred on sheep, wool and the commercial conversion of extensive Aboriginal-managed grasslands into European pastoral estates. The company's expansion had devastating consequences for the Peerapper people, whose Country occupied much of north-western Tasmania. Land was taken without consent, and company employees participated in violent campaigns intended to remove Indigenous people from the region. The Cape Grim massacre and other acts of violence are closely associated with the company's early history. By the mid-1830s, the Peerapper had been killed, displaced or transported to the Wybalenna Aboriginal Establishment on Flinders Island. This history is an essential part of understanding the company's formation and legacy. For much of the nineteenth century, the company's agricultural operations generated limited returns. During the latter part of that century, timber harvesting and timber exports became increasingly important, at times producing more revenue than farming. The company also contributed to the construction of the early Emu Bay Railway between 1875 and 1884, helping connect north-western production areas with coastal transport infrastructure. The company's environmental legacy is also contested. It introduced bounties for thylacines from the early 1830s, contributing to persecution of the species, and its activities coincided with the destruction of local Tasmanian emu populations. These actions reflect the nineteenth-century colonial agricultural practices through which native ecosystems were cleared, controlled and replaced with livestock landscapes. During the twentieth century, Van Diemen's Land Company gradually disposed of much of its original grant. By the 1970s, its remaining estate had been reduced largely to the Woolnorth property, approximately one-seventh of the land originally selected. Ownership later changed from New Zealand-linked interests to Australian and then Chinese-controlled investment. OnCard agreed to acquire the company in 2015, and Moon Lake Investments completed a purchase in 2016. Moon Lake subsequently adopted the name Van Dairy Limited. In the twenty-first century, the business has been associated more with dairy production than with its original wool enterprise. Parts of the remaining estate were sold in 2021 and 2024 to institutional and pastoral investors, including Prime Value and TRT Pastoral Group. In 2024, the company lost a significant milk-supply contract with Fonterra and reduced its dairy herd. Van Diemen's Land Company therefore represents both a continuing agricultural enterprise and a surviving institutional link to Tasmania's colonial pastoral economy.
History
Van Diemen's Land Company emerged from the British imperial policy of promoting large private corporations and wealthy investors as instruments for developing colonial land and supplying raw materials to British industry. In the early 1820s, policymakers sought to expand commercial wool production in Australia, where land was available to colonial interests and Britain's textile factories created strong demand for fibre. The company was organised in 1824 and received a royal charter in November 1825. Its original investors were predominantly London merchants interested in a large pastoral operation rather than a small settler farm. The directors initially sought 500,000 acres in the largely unsettled north-west of Van Diemen's Land, between Port Sorell and Cape Grim. The 1825 charter authorised a smaller grant of 250,000 acres, but by 1828 the company had secured an enlarged grant of approximately 350,000 acres in several extensive blocks. This made it the dominant private landholder across much of north-western Tasmania. Edward Curr arrived in the colony in 1826 and established the company's headquarters at Circular Head. The ship Tranmere transported early supplies, livestock and labourers, while surveyor Henry Hellyer explored and mapped country selected for grazing and settlement. The company's principal holdings included Woolnorth, Circular Head, Robbins Island, Middlesex Plains, Hampshire Hills, Surrey Hills and Emu Bay. These landscapes were not empty wilderness. They were occupied and managed by the Peerapper people, who maintained open grasslands and hunting grounds through long-established cultural burning practices. The company's pastoral expansion appropriated this Country and attempted to replace Indigenous land use with sheep grazing and other forms of colonial agriculture. Under Curr's management, the company pursued an openly violent policy against the Peerapper. Company employees were involved in massacres and forced removals, including the Cape Grim massacre. Colonial violence, introduced disease, displacement and confinement destroyed Peerapper society in the region. By 1835, surviving Peerapper people had either been killed, driven from their Country or removed to the Wybalenna Aboriginal settlement on Flinders Island. The company's early prosperity and landholding must therefore be understood in connection with dispossession and frontier violence. The original wool-growing plan produced weak financial results for many years, with farming costs often only barely recovered. By the 1880s, timber cutting and timber exports had become more profitable than pastoral production. The company also participated in developing transport infrastructure, constructing the early stages of the Emu Bay Railway between 1875 and 1884. Its operations contributed to the transformation of north-west Tasmania into a commercial agricultural and timber region. The company also affected native wildlife. It introduced thylacine bounties from about 1830, encouraging the killing of a species already under pressure from habitat change and other colonial practices. The company's land conversion and hunting activities were also associated with the disappearance of local Tasmanian emu populations. These aspects of its history have made it a subject of environmental as well as colonial criticism. During the twentieth century, the company retained parts of its original selection but progressively sold or relinquished most of the estate. By the 1970s, its principal remaining holding was Woolnorth, representing roughly one-seventh of the land originally selected. Ownership changed in the twenty-first century. The New Plymouth District Council in New Zealand, through Taranaki Investment Management Limited, sought a purchaser in 2014. OnCard announced an acquisition agreement in 2015, and Moon Lake Investments purchased the company in 2016. Moon Lake later changed the operating name to Van Dairy Limited. The modern business has increasingly centred on dairy farming and livestock rather than the wool enterprise envisioned by its founders. Asset sales in 2021 and 2024 reduced the land base further and transferred selected farms and pastoral areas to Prime Value and TRT Pastoral Group. In February 2024, the loss of a major Fonterra milk contract prompted a reduction in the dairy herd. The company remains an active agricultural enterprise, but its contemporary scale, ownership and product mix differ substantially from those of the nineteenth-century corporation.
- 2024Dairy contract lost and further land sold
The business lost a major Fonterra milk contract, reduced its herd and sold another portion of land to Prime Value.
- 2021Pastoral assets divested
Twelve farms and additional Woolnorth-area land were sold to Prime Value and TRT Pastoral Group.
- 2016Moon Lake Investments acquires company
Moon Lake Investments completed the acquisition and later changed the business name to Van Dairy Limited.
- 2015OnCard acquisition agreement announced
OnCard announced an agreement to acquire the company from its New Zealand-linked owner.
- 1880Timber becomes an important business
By the 1880s, timber felling and exports were generating more income than the company's farming operations.
- 1875Emu Bay Railway construction begins
The company became involved in construction of the early Emu Bay Railway, completed in its initial stages by 1884.
- 1835Peerapper displaced from north-west Tasmania
By this period, Peerapper people had been killed, expelled or removed to Wybalenna as a result of frontier violence and colonial displacement.
- 1830Thylacine bounty introduced
The company began offering bounties for thylacines, contributing to persecution of the species.
- 1828Land grant expanded
The company's authorised landholding increased to approximately 350,000 acres across several large north-western Tasmanian blocks.
- 1826Circular Head headquarters established
Edward Curr arrived in the colony and established the company's operational base at Circular Head.
- 1825Royal charter granted
The company received a royal charter and was authorised to pursue its pastoral development project in Van Diemen's Land.
- 1824Company organised
A group of British investors organised the company as a large-scale wool-growing venture for the British textile market.
Products and positioning
A long-established Tasmanian pastoral enterprise whose historical identity is rooted in wool and sheep farming, and whose contemporary activities have focused increasingly on dairy and livestock production.
Dairy milkDairy
Contemporary operations have focused substantially on milk production from dairy herds in north-western Tasmania. Milk has become more central to the business than the wool enterprise for which the company was originally established. The company has supplied major dairy-sector customers, including Fonterra, although its major contract ended in 2024.
Sheep and woolPastoral livestock1825
Sheep farming and wool production were the company's original commercial purpose. British investors expected Tasmanian pastoral land to provide wool for textile manufacturers in Britain. Sheep and wool remained part of the company's historical identity, although the modern business is more strongly associated with dairy and mixed livestock operations.
Beef cattle and livestockLivestock farming
The company has operated extensive pastoral properties supporting cattle and other livestock. These activities form part of its broader land-based agricultural model and have continued alongside dairy production and the management or divestment of large rural properties.
TimberForestry
Timber harvesting and exports became an important source of income during the nineteenth century, particularly by the 1880s when timber reportedly generated more revenue than farming. This was a major historical diversification of the company's original wool-focused business.
Flagship businesses
- Dairy milk production
- Woolnorth pastoral operations
- Large-scale livestock farming
Brand decisions
- 2024Reduce dairy herd after loss of milk contractStrategy
The company lost a major milk contract with Fonterra.
What changed. Van Dairy reduced its dairy herd by at least 700 cows, with reports indicating that the reduction may have reached several thousand animals.
Aftermath. The contract loss reduced the scale of the company's dairy operations and highlighted its dependence on major milk purchasers.
- 2016Change ownership to Moon Lake InvestmentsM&A
The company's New Zealand-linked owner sought to exit the investment after decades of ownership.
What changed. Moon Lake Investments acquired the company and later used the name Van Dairy Limited.
Aftermath. The business moved into Chinese-controlled ownership and became more closely identified with contemporary dairy production.
Acquisition value. A$280 million (2016)
- 1880Expand into timberStrategy
Pastoral farming often generated only modest returns, creating pressure to find more profitable uses for the company's extensive holdings.
What changed. The company increased timber felling and timber exports, which by the 1880s had become more profitable than farming.
Aftermath. Timber became a significant historical business line and strengthened the company's connection to regional transport development.
- 1825Adopt large-scale wool pastoralismStrategy
British textile manufacturing created demand for reliable wool supplies, while imperial policy encouraged private companies to commercialise colonial land.
What changed. The company pursued a very large land grant in north-western Van Diemen's Land and developed sheep and wool operations.
Aftermath. The strategy established the company as a dominant landholder but also produced weak returns for many years and caused severe Indigenous dispossession and environmental damage.
Leadership
| Name | Title | Tenure |
|---|---|---|
| Edward Curr | Colonial managerformer | 1826– |
| James Bischoff | Director associated with the company's establishmentformer | 1824– |
| William Sorell | Colonial manager associated with the company's formationformer | 1824– |
Controversies
- 1830Thylacine persecutionControversy
The company introduced bounties for thylacines, encouraging their killing and contributing to the broader colonial persecution and ecological disruption that preceded the species' extinction.
- 1830Decline of Tasmanian emu populationsControversy
The company's land conversion and hunting practices were associated with the decimation and eventual disappearance of local Tasmanian emu populations.
- 1826Dispossession and violence against the PeerapperControversy
The company's expansion appropriated Peerapper Country in north-western Tasmania. Under colonial manager Edward Curr, company employees participated in violent campaigns, including the Cape Grim massacre, and pursued the killing or removal of Indigenous people. By 1835, the Peerapper had been largely destroyed as a resident community in the region.
Recent events
- 2024Van Dairy loses major Fonterra milk contract
The loss of a major milk-supply contract with Fonterra led to a substantial reduction in the company's dairy herd.
OtherLeadership change - 2024Additional Tasmanian land sold to Prime Value
A further portion of the company's landholding was sold to Prime Value.
M&A - 2021Parts of the Tasmanian estate sold to Prime Value and TRT Pastoral Group
The company sold pastoral assets including farms and Woolnorth-area land to Prime Value and TRT Pastoral Group.
M&A - 2016Moon Lake Investments completes acquisition
Moon Lake Investments, controlled by Lu Xianfeng, acquired the company; the business later adopted the name Van Dairy Limited.
M&A - 2015OnCard agrees to acquire Van Diemen's Land Company
Australian company OnCard announced an agreement to buy the business after acquiring Meander Valley Dairy.
M&A - 2014New Zealand-linked owner seeks to sell Van Diemen's Land Company
The company's owner, New Plymouth District Council through Taranaki Investment Management Limited, announced efforts to sell the historic Tasmanian pastoral business.
M&A
Sources
Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/van-diemens-land-company · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled