Reception
Following its widespread launch in February 2015, Khushbu Shah of Eater.com wrote that overall reviews of the milk were mixed, although the chocolate variety, in particular, was generally well received.[21]
Dietitians and nutritionists were generally critical of the milk; Alissa Rumsey, a spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics expressed, "When you really look at the numbers, it can sound appealing, but in general most Americans are already getting enough protein," adding, "If you need more, eat an egg or a handful of almonds. And people who need more calcium should up their intake of dark leafy greens, not the so-called Frankenmilk."[4] Registered dietitian Keri Gans claimed, "milk is already a great package of nutrients; I’m not quite sure why it needs to be changed," and commented on the removal of sugar in fairlife milk with, "I never looked at the sugar in milk as a problem."[4] Meredith Engel of New York Daily News speculated that, "it’s clear why Coke is trying to get into the milk business: More and more Americans are turning away from sugary soft drinks, and soda sales fell to a 19-year-low in 2013."[4] Men's Health nutrition advisor Mike Roussell, however advised his clients to switch over to fairlife's milk.[22]
Hayley Peterson of Business Insider wrote, "The chocolate milk was the crowd favorite. It's very sweet, but not overpowering, and the consistency is creamier and thicker than regular milk."[10] Peterson adds that, "most people agreed that the 2% milk tasted similar to whole milk. Many reviewers loved the milky taste, while others thought it was too overpowering."[10] Sam Rega, a Business Insider video producer commented, "Both skim and 2% had an after-taste, but otherwise I couldn't tell much of a difference from this and regular milk."[10]
While Chris Plante of The Verge commented, "to my surprise, Fairlife tastes, well, like milk. It looks and feels a little thicker than traditional milk, and has a slightly richer taste, especially the chocolate milk, which sits on the spectrum between chocolate shake and milk that's stewed on a lazy Saturday morning in a bowl of Cocoa Puffs," he criticized the aftertaste, stating, "Fairlife's aftertaste is less appealing. A few minutes sipping a cup of chocolate Fairlife and then a cup of 2% Fairlife, the inside of my mouth had that malty feel that chases a protein shake."[23] Rachel Sanders of BuzzFeed observed, "Fairlife is a little bit creepy to drink. The texture is much more viscous and thick than regular milk, and the odor is really strong, to the point that it smells almost spoiled. It tastes OK, but has a slightly musky flavor that reminds me of shelf-stable or reconstituted milk."[3]
In 2024, Food and Wine described fairlife as "making real dairy cool again," with the publication's Merlyn Miller noting the milk's taste and utility for consumers seeking additional protein or lactose-free options.[24]
Registered dietitian Lauren Manaker, writing for Eat This, Not That in 2024, highlighted fairlife protein shakes as "an excellent source of protein" for muscle building and maintenance, noting that the ultra-filtered milk process yields higher protein concentration than regular milk. She also observed that the inclusion of lactase enzyme makes the products accessible to lactose-intolerant consumers.[25]
fairlife products have performed well in comparative taste evaluations. In 2023, Sporked rated the chocolate milk 9.5 out of 10, describing it as "extremely good" with balanced sweetness and creaminess.[26] Bon Appétit called fairlife shakes "the most delicious of the bunch" in a protein shake comparison.[27] EatingWell named Core Power the best-tasting protein shake at Costco, praising its smooth texture as free of the chalkiness common to protein products.[28]